it's good because we don't want another shooting like the new town one
about 11 years ago
Reply
Second amendment this law is unconstitutional guns don't kill people, people kill people some people shouldn't have guns
about 11 years ago
Reply
oh yeah don't let criminals have guns because they alway follow the law
about 11 years ago
Reply
meanwhile the people who do follow laws won't have anything to protect themselves!
about 11 years ago
Reply
@Sarah some people r responsible others r not aka ur criminals
about 11 years ago
Reply
exactly so you can't just take away their guns, they'll still find new ones
about 11 years ago
Reply
that were the police come in
about 11 years ago
Reply
It goes against the second amendment. That's all I have to say. It's unconstitutional and not right. Like Sarah said, people who really want guns will still be able to get their hands on them.
about 11 years ago
Reply
it's a mess is what it is and yes I do agree
about 11 years ago
Reply
I love how the "ther stupid" choice there* isn't even spelt right lol who's the stupid one
about 11 years ago
Reply
@Sapphire, so by your logic we should just give north korea nukes because "they will still get there hands on them"
about 11 years ago
Reply
highqualitydirt.... Lowqualitylogic... I
would no sooner "give North Korea a nuke" than I would give a burglar, who is trying to rob me, a gun. The bad guys will get them regardless
about 11 years ago
Reply
Terrible, if people come to take them I'll shoot em and they can have once I'm dead
about 11 years ago
Reply
@Michael Moon You said it! They can have my guns, but they're gonna get the bullets first!
about 11 years ago
Reply
@Screamin' Lord Byron hahaha *low quality logic*
about 11 years ago
Reply
@Screamin' Lord Byron, yes it is low quality logic, so why do you support it, true "bad guys" will get them regardless, but that doesn't mean we should give them to them
about 11 years ago
Reply
Without gun ban:
Criminal- has gun for criminal reasons
Law abiding citizen- has gun for protection
With gun ban:
Criminal- has gun for criminal reasons
Law abiding citizen- no gun for protection
about 11 years ago
Reply
I think it's great, that USA's getting new gun laws. I'm from another country, and we have gun laws. It's a very safe country, I'm living in, and you can protect yourself without a weapon. You don't need a gun.
over 10 years ago
Reply
@LittleSwiftie maybe but as people have said ( A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.) is a thing we have in one of the oldest documents in American history
about 10 years ago
Reply
Our forefathers said that our right to keep & bare arms shall not be infringed.
about 10 years ago
Reply
guns need to be banned
almost 9 years ago
Reply
Guns don't kill people. People with ANY kind of weapons can kill people.
almost 9 years ago
Reply
@๐๐Totally๐๐ including guns
almost 9 years ago
Reply
@Sara๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐ ๐
almost 9 years ago
Reply
@Sara๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐ It's statistically shown that nations with banned guns have higher murder rates WITH guns.
almost 9 years ago
Reply
@Sara๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐
Guns are legal: Regular people: Have guns
Criminals: Have guns
This allows regular people to have protection from criminals with guns.
Guns are illegal: Regular people: Don't have guns
Criminals: Have guns
This allows criminals to be able to kill/rob regular people that don't have guns with ease.
almost 9 years ago
Reply
popular
recent