Yes. I love animals but horrible as it is, it's necessary. It's not worth risking the health and lives of people many, many people, just to save a few animals that are in a way less important.
almost 10 years ago
Reply
i think it's fine to test on them as long as it's not for cosmetics
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@Llew Why's that?
almost 10 years ago
Reply
cosmetics the animals are suffering for beauty products which is unnecessary whereas scientific research is necessary even though the animals might suffer
almost 10 years ago
Reply
Yes, but people aren't going to stop buying and producing cosmetics and we don't want anything bad to happen to the people that use those products
almost 10 years ago
Reply
Well, those products might not be essential to saving lives. People by them because they aren't happy with the way they look naturally which is their own problem.
almost 10 years ago
Reply
I know that, but I'm saying we wouldn't want those people that use those products to be seriously fucked up by them, especially considering if people did stop doings he tests on animals they wouldn't tell the general public, so they'd be unaware of the risk
If they stopped making those products altogether that'd work, but then people with low self esteem will be flipping shit, which isn't that bad for some people, but is awful to others
Is it worth mistreating animals to have those people feel more secure about themselves? That's a personal opinion. I don't really think its worth it... But I'm not opposed to makeup or anything. I wish people could figure out better ways of doing this shit
almost 10 years ago
Reply
i just think the problem with that is that society has made people more concious about how they look
almost 10 years ago
Reply
Yea, I agree. Fucking hate society XD
almost 10 years ago
Reply
ye it's a bitch
almost 10 years ago
Reply
I think the people who say no dont realise how much they benefit from this type of testing
almost 10 years ago
Reply
Yep, they're the people who are like "hurting poor animals?! That's wrong!" without putting into consideration how important it is... This society teaches us to act like we love all living things, and imprints in our minds that hurting animals is wrong, and people stick with what they were told instead of thinking for themselves which is why they are against stuff like this
almost 10 years ago
Reply
i think its more important to save humans than it is to save animals
almost 10 years ago
Reply
agreed. It is
almost 10 years ago
Reply
some people just dont get that
almost 10 years ago
Reply
I agree
almost 10 years ago
Reply
animals can't speak for themselves we can its cruel
almost 10 years ago
Reply
i would rather test medince and cures on animals to save possibly millions of humans that let a few mice survive and lose countless human lives
almost 10 years ago
Reply
Yeah it's not just mice they test on it could be any animal my point is that we can say whether we want it done those animals can't plus when humans get tested, they get rewarded
almost 10 years ago
Reply
okay, give the animals a treat then if u want to reward them
almost 10 years ago
Reply
its a matter of would u rather save humans or animals. I personally, prefer to save humans
almost 10 years ago
Reply
Humans have make a difference in people's lives, some even save lives. Other animals are cute. I think humans win on this one xD
almost 10 years ago
Reply
humans should be the priority
almost 10 years ago
Reply
Yes of course
almost 10 years ago
Reply
i cant believe how many people would rather save some animals than humans
almost 10 years ago
Reply
That orangutan has some big ol' titties
almost 10 years ago
Reply
i know!! 😂😂
almost 10 years ago
Reply
I say yes. It's necessary.
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@emraldYE thank you!! Someone else who understands
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@Llew And I'm even a tree hugger! :)
almost 10 years ago
Reply
haha are u actually?
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@Llew Yes. Literally. In fact, kissed a tree today. But it was HUGE! I think it was the biggest one I've ever seen. Ik it's weird, but I'm not backing out on showing a 350 year old tree someone cares about it.
almost 10 years ago
Reply
wow i didnt know tree huggers actually hugged trees. I thought it was just an expression
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@Llew Well I'm a nature lover as well. But yeah 😊
almost 10 years ago
Reply
I like nature but im not that bothered about it.
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@Llew I was absolutely BLOWN AWAY by that tree though. I took two pieces of bark from it and a leaf to press. The very base of it looked almost 10 feet wide.
almost 10 years ago
Reply
big tree!! I still wouldn't take a souvenir from it though
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@emraldYE Tree hugging bros! 👊✌
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@👑MirandaKnowsWhat'sUp👑 YEAH!!! 👊
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@emraldYE I've never kissed a tree before lol but I love nature
almost 10 years ago
Reply
🎶I kissed a tree and I liked it🎶
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@Ethan 😂
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@Ethan hahaha
almost 10 years ago
Reply
noooo!
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@MeganChelseaT not even to save human lives?
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@Llew uhhhh dunno I ❤️ animals though 🐵
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@MeganChelseaT i think its a necessary evil
almost 10 years ago
Reply
Nonononononono!!!!!!! That's horrible
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@alpacataylor
I know I'm the same way but it is what it is...
almost 10 years ago
Reply
@alpacataylor😥
almost 10 years ago
Reply
because they might test something bad
over 9 years ago
Reply
or they might test a cure for cancer
over 9 years ago
Reply
67% would rather save a mouse than a person. Society at its finest
over 9 years ago
Reply
@🎩Llew🎩 They're mostly innocent little kids who can't think through the situation
over 9 years ago
Reply
because it might make them really I'll or raven kill them
over 9 years ago
Reply
so u'd rather save a mouse than cure cancer?
over 9 years ago
Reply
No. Why do people feel like the crown of creation?! We're not any better than animals. Besides, we're all gonna die one day, sooner or later, all of us will be gone. So medecine or not, death is waiting for all of us.
over 9 years ago
Reply
death is waiting for the animals to. So what if we accelerate the process for them to live longer ourselves. And besides, we are the crown creation
over 9 years ago
Reply
so u would rather let millions of people die if not billions through various diseases than test medicines, which could work, on some mice?
over 9 years ago
Reply
for beauty products i agree with u, but in an attempt to save lives, it's a necessary evil
over 9 years ago
Reply
@🎩Llew🎩 I personally think, we should just all live the way we do and if our time's up then we have to accept it. I mean I admit I don't wanna die from cancer ir anything like that but I'd rather die than kill thousands of animals.
over 9 years ago
Reply
i would rather save humans than mice personally. But that's just me and my own views towards helping mankind
over 9 years ago
Reply
@🎩Llew🎩 yes, I respect that, we all have our own opinions.
over 9 years ago
Reply
Animals and humans need to be treated equally
over 9 years ago
Reply
except for when we need cures for cancer
over 9 years ago
Reply
@doglovermax Yeah, animals should have the right to vote, own property, get jobs, and get paychecks just like humans
over 9 years ago
Reply
😂 thats funny👆
over 9 years ago
Reply
Progress is necessary. As long as we preserve animals and nature, it's okay for us to sacrifice a few animals for our own preservation.
over 9 years ago
Reply
it's not a nice thought but it's necessary
about 9 years ago
Reply
there are regulations it's not like they can just go around doing whatever they want to animals. There are ethical guidelines that they have to abide by
about 9 years ago
Reply
when people say that it's wrong to put humans first they're just dumb. The amount of animals humans have helped just out of kindness and morality
about 9 years ago
Reply
@#HCQ sweetcattiem👑 but that doesn't make up for killing millions of animals
about 9 years ago
Reply
@noe the animals wouldn't be there in the first place as they are bred to be tested on
about 9 years ago
Reply
I mean we can't just use humans especially if it's to do with some deadly disease, but it be nice if humans would at least volunteer.
about 9 years ago
Reply
@#HCQ sweetcattiem👑 well better not there at all than to be tested on
about 9 years ago
Reply
@💧Josie💧 I have no idea
about 9 years ago
Reply
@noe I bet there are tonnes of beauty products and medications you have used that have been tested on animals
about 9 years ago
Reply
@noe before the MMR vaccines tonnes of children were dieing .... The MMR vaccine was tested on animals
about 9 years ago
Reply
@noe animals that are being tested on are well looked after, there are ethical regulations that the companies have to abide by, it is controlled.
about 9 years ago
Reply
popular
recent